The Self-Licking Ice Cream Cone Built Elephant - Information Flow and Organizational Success

"There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding out."

Russian Proverb

You may have heard of the Indian parable immortalized in John Godfrey Saxe’s poem of the group of blind men, who come upon an elephant. Each tries to create an accurate concept of what they have found based upon their own perspective. “It’s a tree!” “It’s a wall!” “It’s a snake!” All are correct, but none of them in entirety. In order to get the true picture, they need an effective exchange of information.

Similarly, in our professional world, the critical pieces of vital information are spread among various parts of the organization, and while each has an important contribution to make to the entire operation, until they get out of their silo and integrate their piece of the puzzle with the other pieces of information spread throughout the organization, we have another analogy – the self-licking ice cream cone.

When organizational information is kept in silos and the work of the various departments is based primarily on their own information without outside input, we have the proverbial self-licking ice cream cone. This is seen when R&D builds something because the engineers think it is a great idea without asking production what it would cost to produce or marketing and sales if there is anyone out there who would actually buy it at that cost. It is not that it cannot be mass-produced, or that there is no market for it, it is that the necessary stakeholders were not brought into the process at an early enough stage to ensure the self-licking ice cream cone does not build an elephant that looks more like a tree than an elephant.

I learned early in my project and operations management career that I cannot possibly know everything. In my first full-time role as a project manager, despite my lack of formal IT training, I was assigned several IT-intensive projects. Faced with this knowledge gap, I learned the value of using experts to fill in where I was lacking. I brought the necessary subject matter experts onto my team.

Much later, while interviewing an executive at a major regional bank, this concept was brought back to me as he explained his resistance to corporate pressure to restructure his division. He explained that he had built the organization with his own strengths and weaknesses in mind. He had brought in people to shore up the organization where he was weak. 

However, this requires a high degree of understanding of oneself and of others.

I explain in my article “The Blind Leading the Blind – Emotional Intelligence and the Unaware Leader” that the first step to any kind of leadership is self-awareness, followed closely by awareness of others. This is true whether you lead major bank division or a project team. You must understand your tasks, your and your people’s strengths and weaknesses and then build your teams accordingly.

Having a well-rounded team provides the expertise and points of view to find the most effective solutions. It also helps ensure all stakeholders have input into the project and are apprised of progress on aspects of the project that are of interest to them and that are aware of changes coming their way.

However, the benefits of effective cross-functional communication and input go beyond the project itself into implementation and adoption. Unfortunately, this is where many initiatives fail.

Including others in the entire process eases resistance to change by ensuring all have real input and buy-in to the process and a stake in the success of the project. Having changes thrust upon you, which you are not ready for and had no input into elicits resistance.

On the other hand, having production, marketing, sales, and distribution represented on the team result in processes and products, which have integrated the needs of all from the beginning.  This will help integrate the new capabilities into current processes and minimizes painful and expensive adjustments that often accompany poorly coordinated hand-offs between functions. 

This means production has the processes in place when R&D turns the product over to them, and marketing and sales have ready customer demand and distribution channels ready when the product begins rolling out the doors.

In today’s world dominated by agile product development resulting in a constant flow of new iPhones, software, and tools, those who can best gauge the voice of the customer, get the best product to market, in the shortest time, and at the lowest cost reap the benefits of being the first mover.

Those who cannot mobilize their organizational assets effectively to stay ahead of the competition go the way of companies like Borders, Blockbuster, and Palm Inc., maker of the Palm Pilot. All of which were overtaken by change they refused to acknowledge just as each blind man refused to acknowledge the elephant was anything more than a wall, a tree, a rope, a snake, and a spear. Mobilizing the power of organizational knowledge can help us see clearly the full picture and act on the resulting clarity.

Going Far Together – The Value of Cultural Guides in Cross-Cultural Communication

“If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” 

African Proverb

The anecdote goes, that many years ago, a plane full of gold went down in the middle of Siberia. When the KGB had finally located the wreckage, they were shocked to find that the gold was gone. After careful examination, they discovered tracks in the snow leading through the forest to an indigenous hunter’s cabin. The hunter answered their authoritative knocks, but to their dismay, they found he spoke no Russian. Leaving the man under guard, they located an interpreter and began the interrogation.

“Where is the gold?” they demand. The interpreter conveys their question and the peasant claims ignorance.

The agents pressed further, “We followed your tracks from the crash site to your cabin. We know you have the gold. Where is it?” The interpreter repeats the question in the hunter’s own tongue.

The man again feigns ignorance. The agents realize more persuasive measures are required. One pulls out his weapon and points it at the hunter’s head.

“If you don’t tell us where the gold is, your days are over!”

The hunter breaks. “I buried it under the tree behind my cabin! Please don’t shoot me!” he pleads desparately.

The interpreter, without hesitation says, “Go ahead and shoot, I’m not going to tell you a thing!”

Interpreters are often indispensable when working in a global environment. The skill, trustworthiness, and professionalism of your interpreter can make or break your negotiations. You rely on them to keep you abreast of all that transpires during your meetings with your foreign counterparts. In fact, they may be the only one in the room that gets the whole picture.

However, finding someone that can take your ideas in language A and convey them to your partner in language B is only the beginning. A truly effective interpreter understands the target culture at a much deeper level. As they are well versed in the history, literature, and etiquette of the culture, they are also able to help you navigate the cultural and social intricacies of these cross-cultural interactions. In other words, they must be more than an interpreter. They must be a cultural guide.

Another story illustrates their value:

After months of correspondence, an American company has finally landed a meeting with a key Korean retail distributer. This company has the best distribution chain in the country and ties to other distributers throughout East Asia. They enter the conference room, shake hands, and exchange business cards. The host takes the American leader’s card in both hands, looks at it, carefully and thanks them by name. The American looks at the Korean’s card briefly, memorizes his name and title, and puts it in his pocket. The Korean host’s demeanor cools noticeably, but since he continues discussions, the Americans think nothing of it, but the deal just doesn’t make progress. They don’t understand what happened.

Unfortunately, no one had explained the personal value Asian cultures place on a business card. It is considered an extension of the person and a key component of personal dignity. The card is , a part of what is known as “face.” As such, a business card should be given the same respect that is due the person it belongs to. By not giving the card proper respect, the American offended the host. Teaching local etiquette is a key role of a cultural guide, but this can only happen if their involvement began weeks before the trip.

During my many trips throughout Eastern Europe as part of American official delegations, we would begin our preparations weeks beforehand. As an interpreter, one of my key duties was to prepare a country briefing. This included a short history of the country, a basic familiarization with the language, including key phrases and words. I would follow this with a short lesson on customs and etiquette. One of the lessons I taught included the regimented order of standard toasts in Russia. This had a significant impact on building positive working relations with our hosts. For example, I taught that in military circles, the third toast in Russia is traditionally to the fallen, drunk standing, without clinking glasses. On one multi-site inspection, this third toast fell to my non-Russian speaking team leader. He gave an eloquent tribute to those who had fallen defending both of our homelands, including mention of the Soviet and American soldiers who together defeated fascism. By this simple toast, he earned the enthusiastic esteem of our Russian counterparts. Due to his good relations, he was able to overcome some very thorny issues that arose during the inspection in a very effective and amicable way.

As the above examples show, the insight a cultural guide can provide requires goes beyond linguistic support. Their ability to help avoid missteps and build an affinity with our partners. The cultural literacy the guide provides can pay significant dividends.

As an interpreter, I have supported people from all levels of responsibility from small team leaders to government officials and leaders of national-level NGOs. As I grew in experience, my management responsibilities grew as I managed the interpreters and teams of my own. Regardless of my rank, while serving as the interpreter, my basic duty was to ensure that both sides clearly understood the other. However, early on, I came to understand that my most important role was guiding my team through the intricacies of inter-cultural interaction and ensuring they understood not only the words, but also the unspoken meanings of their partners’ actions and ensure our team’s actions did not convey inappropriate messages.

A cultural guide’s training differs somewhat from a simple interpreter or translator.[1] Whereas many interpreters’ and translators’ skills extend beyond the mechanics of language to include cultural proficiency as well, each individual specialist falls somewhere on the continuum of cultural competency.

Full cultural literacy requires an in-depth understanding of the many factors, which make up the shared understanding and values of a culture. This often requires both formal and informal prolonged exposure to the language and the culture gained from significant time in country and study of its culture, history, art and literature, and philosophies. It is key to understand that language is merely the most basic vehicle by which understanding is shared between people, but it is not the only, and often not the most important one.

To be able to converse at a high or near native level, one needs to understand the unspoken cultural realia that is often interweaved into conversations, especially at a higher intellectual level. A simple phrase can carry meaning understood by natives due to its cultural context. For example, if an American says, “Here’s your sign,” we instantly picture Larry the Cable Guy and understand the implied meaning. No further explanation is necessary. A culturally literate specialist must understand and be able to convey this meaning in both languages.

When looking for an interpreter, it is important that they have the skills, both linguistic and cultural, to give you the support you need. There are some key concepts to keep in mind.

First, you should integrate your cultural guide into your team in the early stages of your preparations. They should be a key part of your planning process. Your guide will understand such vital factors as timelines to expect, the approaches that will be most effective, what would be an appropriate gift, what would be the best hierarchical makeup of your team based on your goals, and many other similar factors that will determine your schedule, scope, and tactics you will employ during your trip. Furthermore, if you visit a certain country regularly, you may want to include a cultural guide as a permanent member of your team.

Second, a cultural study led by your cultural guide should be a key component of your team preparations. This should include a historical synopsis, cultural norms and etiquette, any holidays during your trip, and key words and phrases such as greetings, please, thank you. A study aid or phrase book, including the name and address and phone number of both your host and of your accommodations in the local script to give to a cab driver or law enforcement if the need arises is highly recommended.

Third, your cultural guide should be trusted and confident enough to ask for clarification if something you say or do is unclear or if it may be interpreted negatively. He/she should be comfortable in explaining the possible meaning and consequences of that action or statement and clarify whether that is your intent or not. As with other members of the team, their input should be valued, but a professional interpreter and cultural guide understands that their role is not to lead the team, but to advise and facilitate understanding. Once they are sure the principal understands how the statement will be understood, if they decide to proceed, the interpreter’s role is to convey that meaning – no more, no less.

Fourth, understand that an interpreter/cultural guide interprets meaning, not words. What you say may require expansion or may be conveyed in few words than in your language. It may even not be possible to translate. This is especially true with humor. ALWAYS run jokes by your cultural guide before telling them. Humor often does not translate and puns or plays on words almost never do. Don’t put your interpreter on the spot of the mythical interpreter, whose boss tells a joke that does not translate. The interpreter, in desperation, explains to the audience, “My boss just told a joke that doesn’t translate, but if you don’t laugh, he’ll fire me, so when I say laugh – please laugh.”

Fifth, the cultural guide should not be the team leader. While a team leader well versed in the language and culture is an asset to the team, having another acting as a sounding board and filter is often vital. I have on occasion interpreted for people whose language was on par or better than my own, but wisdom and protocol require an official interpreter.[2] Working through an interpreter has certain benefits in official exchanges. First, if you also speak the language, it gives you a double pass at what your partner is saying and additional time to consider your response. If you do speak the language, I would advise speaking directly with your counterpart, however, during the official portions of the inspection, use your interpreters.

Finally, vet your cultural guide carefully. They will be key in ensuring you and your partner fully understand each other as well as helping you not only avoid the cultural landmines that could scuttle your success. Furthermore, a good cultural guide can also that could give you that added edge.

In our modern, globally connected world, the likelihood we will find ourselves working with people who speak another language and have different cultural norms. Having a well-trained and trustworthy cultural guide to help you navigate the sometimes complicated cultural maze and help you find the common ground where you and your counterparts can take advantage of the strengths each side brings to the table is critical to your success.


[1] Many people use the terms interpreter and translator interchangeably. While many may be able to do both, many professionals focus on one or the other. Translation normally refers to written translation, while interpretation refers to conveying spoken communication in another language.

[2] If you do speak the language, but are working through an interpreter, never publicly criticize or correct your interpreter. You will only discredit him/her and yourself in front of your counterparts.

A Mile in Another's Shoes – The Value of Perspective

Developing a Global Mindset through Foreign Language and Cultural Immersion

"He who does not travel, does not know the value of men." Moorish Proverb 

An American negotiating team arrives in Riyadh.  They are sure their proposal will be a big hit with the Saudi negotiating team.  Their talking points are ready, and they feel they should have the whole thing sewn up by evening.  However, their best-laid plans begin to unravel as the Saudis refuse to act like Americans.  They just don’t seem to want to get down to business.  The meetings start with coffee and small talk without a mention of business, and continue with tours of the city and other social events.  The Americans are growing frustrated.  What did they miss?

The thing is the Saudis are not doing anything wrong.  Just as the Americans are acting like Americans, the Saudis are just being Saudis.  For them, you must show your guests hospitality and get to know your prospective partners before you start talking business – to do otherwise would be rude.  This approach to business, common in many cultures including Arab, Asian, Latin, and Slavic is often unfamiliar to Germanic and Anglo-Saxon cultures, where friendship is friendship, business is business, and the one does not necessarily have to exist for the other to happen.  For these cultures, time is precious and the thinking is, “We came on business so let’s get to it!”

This may be a fictional caricature of a common situation, but it illustrates the intricacies of cross-cultural interactions occurring daily around the world.  As the global economy continues to grow and integrate, more and more people are coming into contact with other cultures and finding that not everyone works, thinks, or acts as they do. 

Just a few decades ago, relatively few people had direct contact with people outside their own country.  Most of their acquaintances were just like them. 

Things have changed dramatically.  The Internet, social media, and modern transportation have changed the way we live and interact with the world outside our own communities.  The effects on everyday life are significant. 

In today’s globally connected virtual economy, anyone with a computer and an internet connection can find and find your business, leading to not only new customers and but also to new partners.

For example, acting on a friend’s suggestion, a farmer set up a website to help grow his feed sales.  His website succeeded beyond his expectations when a customer placed a large order from China.  This farmer found himself in a crash course on international trade.

Checkpoint Charlie and Warning Sign in Cold War Berlin

As the world continues to integrate, the exchange of ideas, capital, and goods across borders has reduced hostility and border controls between countries.  As William Shurtz, the second president of Thunderbird School of Global Management pointed out, "Borders frequented by trade seldom need soldiers."[1]    

Border posts now stand empty across Europe and free trade agreements are proliferating around the globe.  Even when conflict does arise, as it has between Russia and Ukraine, it is often moderated by economic ties and potential loss of markets. 

With all these global opportunities, what can provide a competitive advantage? 

A common characteristic of today’s most successful companies is their ability to leverage diversity and foster the free exchange of ideas.  Those brave enough to seek out and welcome ideas that challenge their own paradigms find benefits, which would be unachievable in a mono-cultural setting. 

For example, Google’s famous free lunches and recreation rooms are more than perks.  They are part of a larger strategy to facilitate contact between people from different backgrounds, specialties, and functions.  Providing settings, where their employees can exchange ideas with people outside their normal social or professional spheres allows Google to mobilize the capabilities and perspectives of different people to resolve problems, create new innovative products, and find ways to increase the customer base.    

As with any great opportunity, diversity also presents its own problems.  Working with those who think and act differently increases chances for conflict and misunderstanding.  To navigate these waters, we must take time to understand the cultures and people we will be working with, we must build an appreciation of the diversity in the world around us, and foster a spirit of adventure to explore it.  We need to build a global mindset.[2] 

Monsour Javidan, the Executive Director of Thunderbird School of Global Management’s Najafi Global Mindset Institute, describing the Global Mindset in 2010, writes:

“Leaders with a strong stock of Global Mindset know about cultures and political and economic systems in other countries and understand how their global industry works. They are passionate about diversity and are willing to push themselves. They are comfortable with being uncomfortable in uncomfortable environments. They are also better able to build trusting relationships with people who are different from them by showing respect and empathy and by being good listeners.”[3]

Empathy and trust comes through good communication.  Therefore, learning another language and its associated culture is key in building a global mindset.  In 2004 Christine Uber Gross conducted a survey of Thunderbird graduates, who must demonstrate proficiency in a foreign language before graduation, on the impact of foreign language study on their professional life.  She found that 82% of graduates rated the impact of language and cultural literacy in their professional life as significant.[4]  While learning a language is only the first step in gaining a global mindset, it strengthens our ability to empathize with others.

Until we learn to express ourselves in another’s language and see the world from their perspective, we have a hard time seeing beyond our own cultural biases.  In other words, we must spend time walking in another’s shoes.  As we learn about the cultural landmarks, of their art, history, religion, and language, we find that ours are not the only way to see the world around us.  This opens our perspectives and makes us more tolerant of others, even those with whom we do not share a common language.  Language study does more than teach communication – it expands our horizons, opening our minds to new ways of seeing the world and relating to others.

In fact, research has shown that people, who learn to express themselves in another language, learn to see issues from a broader perspective.  This impacts how we learn and positively influences intellectual development.  This is especially evident in bilingual children.  Therese Sullivan Caccavale, President of the National Network for Early Language Learning (NNELL)[5] points out that:

“Studies have shown repeatedly that foreign language learning increases critical thinking skills, creativity, and flexibility of mind in young children. Students who are learning a foreign language out-score their non-foreign language-learning peers in the verbal and, surprisingly to some, the math sections of standardized tests.” 

The way we communicate influences our view on the world and reflects our cultural norms.  However, the interaction between language and culture flow both ways – language is also a product of a society’s shared historical and cultural legacy.  For example, Russians seldom use the verb “to possess something,” but rather say that something is near them.  This is a product of a history where the only person who truly owned anything was the sovereign who could take their possessions away at will.  Conversely, this conception of ownership also influences how Russians themselves view ownership and authority.  In gaining an understanding of others’ perspectives, we can better understand them and build productive relationships.

Building this understanding requires focused study, exposure to different ways of thinking, and immersion in language and culture.  Awareness of this is not new.  Programs like the Middlebury Language Schools[6] and the American Graduate School of International Management (today Thunderbird School of Global Management) [7] pioneered education in language immersion and internationally focused business management in the first half of the 20th Century.  However, with the growth of globalism and international trade have created a greater awareness of the need for cross-cultural and global leadership skills, resulting in a growing number of programs similar to those pioneered at Middlebury and Thunderbird.

Language and international business courses abound using a wide variety of methodology.  However, not all are equally effective.  While school courses, books, and computer programs can provide a basis for cultural and language proficiency, the watershed event in one’s education involves some kind of immersion.  Whether this is formal study abroad or working in a factory with native speakers, only when one is regularly exposed and required to function in a language and navigate the culture, will true proficiency develop. 

Furthermore, higher-level proficiency requires more than grammar and vocabulary.  Whereas much of the higher-level communication takes place in using abstract ideas, cultural context, and inferred meaning, this requires complementing the mechanical aspects of language with an understanding of the target culture.  This requires an immersion, building a sound knowledge of its art, history, religions, climate, political system, values, and many other factors.

Living in another country for an extended time, where you must function not only linguistically, but in daily interpersonal and cultural interactions infuses those aspects of culture, which are impossible to learn in a classroom.  Long-term interaction with the people, their language, and culture reinforces an understanding of the locals’ worldview and norms of interpersonal behavior.  Only then do the deeper, abstract meanings of their conversation begin to make sense.

We live in a world where global trade is no longer the undisputed domain large multinational firms with their substantial war chests of capital allowing them to leverage global markets.  Today, the Internet and cheap and efficient global delivery services allow even small businesses to export their goods around the world, requiring these much smaller companies to work with partners, clients, and legal systems around the world whose native cultures, laws and regulations, and languages are different from their own.

In the modern globalized world of business and mass communication, the ability to understand not only what people say, but also how they feel, their values and desires is vital in maximizing the synergistic potential of our multicultural world. When we can accept others’ way of thinking and living not as wrong, but simply as different from our own, we begin to understand that we can learn and benefit from looking at the world from their perspective. We are then on our way to a richer more fulfilling life as we are better equipped to succeed in business, resolve thorny political issues, to appreciate the wonderful diversity of our world, and build lasting relationships based not on coercion and threats, but on mutual respect. 

While we will not always agree and our interests will not always mesh, when we understand how others see the world and accept their right to do so, we can then find ways to make it a place we all can live in.  Studying not just foreign languages, but various cultural perspectives allows us to enter another’s soul – to walk in their shoes.  This helps us gain a deeper understanding of not only other cultures but our own as well.  The first step to true emotional intelligence is self-awareness.  This is impossible without the reflecting pool of our multicultural world.  When we see our culture and views juxtaposed against others, we can better understand ourselves.  This new understanding will lay the foundation for a truly global mindset and unlock the potential the diversity of our world has to offer.

---

[1]  Thunderbird School of Global Management. About Us. 2 April 2012. 7 April 2012 www.thunderbird.edu/about_thunderbird/thunderbird_good/about/index.htm.

[2] For more information on what a global mindset is and how it influences our ability to interact with the diversity in today’s world, see Thunderbird’s Najafi Global Mindset Institute at http://globalmindset.thunderbird.edu/

[3]  Javidan, Mansour. "Bringing the Global Mindset to Leadership." Harvard Business Review (May 19, 2010): https://hbr.org/2010/05/bringing-the-global-mindset-to.html#.

[4]  Grosse, Christine Uber. "The Competitive Advantage of Foreign Languages and Cultural Knowledge." The Modern Language Journal (Vol. 88, No. 3 (Autumn, 2004)): 351-373.

[5] Duke University. "American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL)." Fall 2007. Cognitive Benfits of Learning Language, Vol 8, Issue 1. http://www.actfl.org/advocacy/discover-languages/for-parents/cognitive#sthash.gk6l0BzU.dpufIf. 1 November 2015.

[6]  Middlebury Language Schools. The Language Schools' Mission Statement. http://www.middlebury.edu/ls/academics/language-schools-mission-statement. 1 November 2015.

[7] Thunderbird School of Global Management.  Thunderbird History.  http://www.thunderbird.edu/thunderbird-history.  1 November 2015.

My Leadership Crucible: Caring Enough to Correct

Photo from Ancient Wessex Network

In the barren deserts south of the Dead Sea is a wasteland covered with ancient piles of slag.  Khirbat Hamra Ifdan was one of the industrial centers that fueled the early Bronze Age.  Copper ore was extracted from nearby mines and brought to this site where ancient metallurgists crushed the ore-laden rock, sorted out the ore-rich pieces, and placed them in a cup-shaped clay crucible.  The crucible was then superheated until the copper separated from the rock and other impurities.  The small amount of pure copper was collected, mixed with tin, and formed into bronze tools, ingots, and jewelry; while left-over material or slag was discarded.  This purification process was painstaking and labor intensive, but the end product turned the Kingdom of Moab and later, Israel, into regional powerhouses. 

Due to its ability to turn the ore-laced rock into something valuable by removing impurities, the crucible and the fiery smelting process became symbolic of personal purification in religious and philosophical circles.  Hence, a crucible in a person’s life denotes a time of extraordinary suffering that results in personal a purification that would have been otherwise impossible without that “trial by fire.” 

Most successful leaders have passed through formative crucibles – seeming purgatories, where we suffer, our weaknesses are purged, and, if not broken by the trial, we emerge on the other side better, wiser, and more effective leaders.   I have endured several such transformative periods.  The first occurred over fifteen years ago.

Through a lot of luck and a bit of persistence, I had made it into an interpreters’ program that I had pursued for two years.  I had made it through two thirds of the nine month course, when I was called in to meet with the human resource manager who would determine where I would go after the program.  Rather than telling me that I would be going on to an exciting new assignment, he explained that the teachers didn’t think I had what it takes to be an effective interpreter and recommended I be dropped from the program.  It was perhaps one of the darkest days of my career. 

Because I knew I was not the most capable student in the program and was acutely aware of my shortcomings, I frequently asked my instructors for feedback and suggestions on what I could do to improve.  Each time I was told, “Don’t worry, you’re doing all right.”  These false reassurances made the news all the more devastating.  It wasn’t the truth that I was inadequate that hurt but the possibly well meaning, but nonetheless misleading reassurances, followed by the unexpected revelation of my real standing in the course.  Honest feedback was what I needed most to succeed or at least prepare myself for the inevitable.  That is what I didn’t get.  It hurt that no one had cared enough to counsel and correct me until I was almost beyond help. 

Fortunately, I was able to convince the manager that he should give me a chance to prove myself.  I asked for an evaluation on an interpreting excursion the next day.  To my relief, based on my performance, the manager told me I would finish the program and be assigned to the agency’s overseas office. 

Although I had made it through this trial, my crucible was still not complete.  It continued, but this time with a leader who cared enough to correct.  Within a month, I found myself in Germany interpreting for arms control inspections throughout Europe.  I was assigned to a team lead by a man I still consider one of the most influential people in my life.  He made it clear he demanded the best from his people and would not settle for less.  Despite my experience at the interpreters’ school, I was still young, immature, overconfident, and under-qualified.  Consequently, I made some critical mistakes. 

In contrast to my earlier experience, each and every time I failed to rise to his high, but fair standards, he immediately and plainly pointed out my shortcomings, informed me of the consequences for continued substandard performance, and then provided me ample training opportunities to remedy my shortcomings.  By the time he left our team a year and a half later, I had been able to rise to the standards he demanded.  His praise for my abilities meant much more to me than the empty praise of those who were afraid to point my deficiencies for fear of hurting my feelings.  The foundation he helped me build was the basis of my current success.

As often happens as we progress from follower to leader, I had to learn this lesson from the opposite perspective.  I was placed in charge of a team of extremely talented specialists, one of which, while a phenomenal analyst, struggled in some key areas.  However, despite my desires to never subject someone to what I had gone through, I too hesitated to confront those behaviors that were bringing down the team’s effectiveness in fear of hurting his feelings.  This led to not only personally suffering the consequences of my inaction, but also to my analyst and my entire team failing to reach their full potential.  As his leader, I should have cared enough to set standards, insist they be met, identify where those standards were not met, and impose consequences and remedies for failure.

Since that time, I have learned the value of clearly setting out expectations, tactfully identifying deficiencies, and mentoring those willing to change and capable of rising to the necessary standards.  Those who repeatedly prove themselves unwilling or unable to adapt must be let go or moved to where they can succeed. 

As many leaders, I enjoy praising and awarding excellence in my subordinates but dislike confronting them and meting out discipline when they repeatedly fail to meet stated standards.   From the above crucibles, I have learned the value of clear and achievable standards, paired with fair and predictable consequences for failing to meet them.  I have learned that I must force myself to move outside my comfort zone by identifying and correcting deficiencies clearly and immediately but then afterward, showing an increased concern for their progress by providing the training and guidance they need. 

While a good leader never relishes confronting their team members, they nevertheless do not shrink from identifying and rectifying substandard situations by clear feedback, equitable discipline and caring remediation.  A leader who ignores or tolerates substandard performance and fails to correct shortcomings while issues are still manageable is more destructive to team effectiveness than the despotic manager who, it seems, relishes the opportunity to criticize and belittle.  While the latter frustrates and irritates, the former sabotages progress and development by refusing to take upon themselves the most vital leadership roles of guide, teacher, and mentor.

In his science fiction classic Starship Troopers, Robert Heinlein illustrates the importance of confronting signs of non-compliance early.  He points out that the leader that truly cares about his people doesn’t tolerate noncompliance and incompetence.  The true leader points out shortcomings unambiguously and corrects not out of malice, but with the aim of teaching correct principles.  Failing that, he removes those who repeatedly show themselves unable or unwilling to perform to required standards.  Nevertheless, even firing a subordinate is done out of concern for them and the rest of the team.  The incompetent or unrepentant can thus succeed elsewhere or at least no longer jeopardize the team’s success. 

In my life, the most memorable and effective leaders were not those that coddled me or ignored my shortcomings, but those that first of all, set and enforced a standard and then either rewarded success lavishly or imposed fair and consistent consequences for failing to meet those standards followed by giving me the tools I needed to not fail again.

While confronting non-conformance is difficult for an engaged and caring leader, we must not lose sight of the value of frank, fair, and consistent feedback.  While rewarding success builds our people up and reinforces good behavior, this one vectored approach must be balanced with caring but consistent feedback and discipline.  Neglecting this key function, we sow the seeds of failure, complacence and incompetence in us, our teams, and our people. 

Similar to a furnace and crucible, a leader’s main goal should be to take the potential-laden team member and help them purge the limitations holding them back.  This does not have to be unpleasant to those we mentor, but all too often, change requires we endure some discomfort if we are to come reach our true potential.  The principle of “caring enough to correct” calls for us to help those we lead get through this discomfort and to reach the success on the other side.