Showing posts with label current events. relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label current events. relations. Show all posts

Monday, January 18, 2016

Going Far Together – The Value of Cultural Guides in Cross-Cultural Communication


“If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” 
African Proverb
The anecdote goes, that many years ago, a plane full of gold went down in the middle of Siberia. When the KGB had finally located the wreckage, they were shocked to find that the gold was gone. After careful examination, they discovered tracks in the snow leading through the forest to an indigenous hunter’s cabin. The hunter answered their authoritative knocks, but to their dismay, they found he spoke no Russian. Leaving the man under guard, they located an interpreter and began the interrogation.

“Where is the gold?” they demand. The interpreter conveys their question and the peasant claims ignorance.

The agents pressed further, “We followed your tracks from the crash site to your cabin. We know you have the gold. Where is it?” The interpreter repeats the question in the hunter’s own tongue.

The man again feigns ignorance. The agents realize more persuasive measures are required. One pulls out his weapon and points it at the hunter’s head.

“If you don’t tell us where the gold is, your days are over!”

The hunter breaks. “I buried it under the tree behind my cabin! Please don’t shoot me!” he pleads desparately.

The interpreter, without hesitation says, “Go ahead and shoot, I’m not going to tell you a thing!”

Interpreters are often indispensable when working in a global environment. The skill, trustworthiness, and professionalism of your interpreter can make or break your negotiations. You rely on them to keep you abreast of all that transpires during your meetings with your foreign counterparts. In fact, they may be the only one in the room that gets the whole picture.

However, finding someone that can take your ideas in language A and convey them to your partner in language B is only the beginning. A truly effective interpreter understands the target culture at a much deeper level. As they are well versed in the history, literature, and etiquette of the culture, they are also able to help you navigate the cultural and social intricacies of these cross-cultural interactions. In other words, they must be more than an interpreter. They must be a cultural guide.

Another story illustrates their value:

After months of correspondence, an American company has finally landed a meeting with a key Korean retail distributer. This company has the best distribution chain in the country and ties to other distributers throughout East Asia. They enter the conference room, shake hands, and exchange business cards. The host takes the American leader’s card in both hands, looks at it, carefully and thanks them by name. The American looks at the Korean’s card briefly, memorizes his name and title, and puts it in his pocket. The Korean host’s demeanor cools noticeably, but since he continues discussions, the Americans think nothing of it, but the deal just doesn’t make progress. They don’t understand what happened.

Unfortunately, no one had explained the personal value Asian cultures place on a business card. It is considered an extension of the person and a key component of personal dignity. The card is , a part of what is known as “face.” As such, a business card should be given the same respect that is due the person it belongs to. By not giving the card proper respect, the American offended the host. Teaching local etiquette is a key role of a cultural guide, but this can only happen if their involvement began weeks before the trip.

During my many trips throughout Eastern Europe as part of American official delegations, we would begin our preparations weeks beforehand. As an interpreter, one of my key duties was to prepare a country briefing. This included a short history of the country, a basic familiarization with the language, including key phrases and words. I would follow this with a short lesson on customs and etiquette. One of the lessons I taught included the regimented order of standard toasts in Russia. This had a significant impact on building positive working relations with our hosts. For example, I taught that in military circles, the third toast in Russia is traditionally to the fallen, drunk standing, without clinking glasses. On one multi-site inspection, this third toast fell to my non-Russian speaking team leader. He gave an eloquent tribute to those who had fallen defending both of our homelands, including mention of the Soviet and American soldiers who together defeated fascism. By this simple toast, he earned the enthusiastic esteem of our Russian counterparts. Due to his good relations, he was able to overcome some very thorny issues that arose during the inspection in a very effective and amicable way.

As the above examples show, the insight a cultural guide can provide requires goes beyond linguistic support. Their ability to help avoid missteps and build an affinity with our partners. The cultural literacy the guide provides can pay significant dividends.

As an interpreter, I have supported people from all levels of responsibility from small team leaders to government officials and leaders of national-level NGOs. As I grew in experience, my management responsibilities grew as I managed the interpreters and teams of my own. Regardless of my rank, while serving as the interpreter, my basic duty was to ensure that both sides clearly understood the other. However, early on, I came to understand that my most important role was guiding my team through the intricacies of inter-cultural interaction and ensuring they understood not only the words, but also the unspoken meanings of their partners’ actions and ensure our team’s actions did not convey inappropriate messages.

A cultural guide’s training differs somewhat from a simple interpreter or translator.[1] Whereas many interpreters’ and translators’ skills extend beyond the mechanics of language to include cultural proficiency as well, each individual specialist falls somewhere on the continuum of cultural competency.

Full cultural literacy requires an in-depth understanding of the many factors, which make up the shared understanding and values of a culture. This often requires both formal and informal prolonged exposure to the language and the culture gained from significant time in country and study of its culture, history, art and literature, and philosophies. It is key to understand that language is merely the most basic vehicle by which understanding is shared between people, but it is not the only, and often not the most important one.

To be able to converse at a high or near native level, one needs to understand the unspoken cultural realia that is often interweaved into conversations, especially at a higher intellectual level. A simple phrase can carry meaning understood by natives due to its cultural context. For example, if an American says, “Here’s your sign,” we instantly picture Larry the Cable Guy and understand the implied meaning. No further explanation is necessary. A culturally literate specialist must understand and be able to convey this meaning in both languages.

When looking for an interpreter, it is important that they have the skills, both linguistic and cultural, to give you the support you need. There are some key concepts to keep in mind.

First, you should integrate your cultural guide into your team in the early stages of your preparations. They should be a key part of your planning process. Your guide will understand such vital factors as timelines to expect, the approaches that will be most effective, what would be an appropriate gift, what would be the best hierarchical makeup of your team based on your goals, and many other similar factors that will determine your schedule, scope, and tactics you will employ during your trip. Furthermore, if you visit a certain country regularly, you may want to include a cultural guide as a permanent member of your team.

Second, a cultural study led by your cultural guide should be a key component of your team preparations. This should include a historical synopsis, cultural norms and etiquette, any holidays during your trip, and key words and phrases such as greetings, please, thank you. A study aid or phrase book, including the name and address and phone number of both your host and of your accommodations in the local script to give to a cab driver or law enforcement if the need arises is highly recommended.

Third, your cultural guide should be trusted and confident enough to ask for clarification if something you say or do is unclear or if it may be interpreted negatively. He/she should be comfortable in explaining the possible meaning and consequences of that action or statement and clarify whether that is your intent or not. As with other members of the team, their input should be valued, but a professional interpreter and cultural guide understands that their role is not to lead the team, but to advise and facilitate understanding. Once they are sure the principal understands how the statement will be understood, if they decide to proceed, the interpreter’s role is to convey that meaning – no more, no less.

Fourth, understand that an interpreter/cultural guide interprets meaning, not words. What you say may require expansion or may be conveyed in few words than in your language. It may even not be possible to translate. This is especially true with humor. ALWAYS run jokes by your cultural guide before telling them. Humor often does not translate and puns or plays on words almost never do. Don’t put your interpreter on the spot of the mythical interpreter, whose boss tells a joke that does not translate. The interpreter, in desperation, explains to the audience, “My boss just told a joke that doesn’t translate, but if you don’t laugh, he’ll fire me, so when I say laugh – please laugh.”

Fifth, the cultural guide should not be the team leader. While a team leader well versed in the language and culture is an asset to the team, having another acting as a sounding board and filter is often vital. I have on occasion interpreted for people whose language was on par or better than my own, but wisdom and protocol require an official interpreter.[2] Working through an interpreter has certain benefits in official exchanges. First, if you also speak the language, it gives you a double pass at what your partner is saying and additional time to consider your response. If you do speak the language, I would advise speaking directly with your counterpart, however, during the official portions of the inspection, use your interpreters.

Finally, vet your cultural guide carefully. They will be key in ensuring you and your partner fully understand each other as well as helping you not only avoid the cultural landmines that could scuttle your success. Furthermore, a good cultural guide can also that could give you that added edge.

In our modern, globally connected world, the likelihood we will find ourselves working with people who speak another language and have different cultural norms. Having a well-trained and trustworthy cultural guide to help you navigate the sometimes complicated cultural maze and help you find the common ground where you and your counterparts can take advantage of the strengths each side brings to the table is critical to your success.


[1] Many people use the terms interpreter and translator interchangeably. While many may be able to do both, many professionals focus on one or the other. Translation normally refers to written translation, while interpretation refers to conveying spoken communication in another language.

[2] If you do speak the language, but are working through an interpreter, never publicly criticize or correct your interpreter. You will only discredit him/her and yourself in front of your counterparts.

Monday, February 16, 2015

Corporate Citizens - Investing in Prosperity

Photos from UNESCO and NTPC
The old adage states, “Give a man a fish and feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime.”  One of the great obstacles to world prosperity is a lack of basic education and vocational training among the disadvantaged of the world.   In its pamphlet The Right to Education UNESCO states:
“Education is an inalienable human right.  It is also unique in that it empowers the individual to exercise other civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, attaining a life of dignity, while ensuring a brighter future for all, free from want and fear.” [1] 
While education is not a silver bullet against all the ills of the world, providing the disadvantaged of the world with that lifeline enables them to more effectively overcome the conditions that bind them to their life of ignorance and poverty.

Due to the economic incentive and the self-respect that gainful employment provides, businesses are in a unique position to influence the populations of the countries in which they operate for good.  There are three basic areas where this influence can be manifest.  First, as an employer, the company can provide vocational training.  Second, it can provide incentive and money for education in job-related fields.  And finally, the business can invest in the local school system, enabling a new generation of quality employees and creating a good public image.  The responsible corporate citizen doesn’t strive to merely extract all possible profit from their host country, but to improve the lot of its citizens as well and build lasting prosperity that will benefit them and the people for years to come.

In reality, these economic relationships are symbiotic relationships in which firms provide income, training, education, economic development, and humanitarian aid to the community and the host society provides motivated employees who are ever more capable of contributing to the profitability of the company.

While much of the world’s humanitarian aid merely applies a bandage to the symptoms of poverty by supplying basic provisions, businesses have the will and incentive to treat poverty’s root causes by providing economic incentives to work, go to school, and challenge the political, social, and institutional barriers to personal prosperity.  The first step is giving employees on-the-job and formal vocational training and then paying them for the use of those skills.  A person values what he has earned more than what is merely given to them.  Similarly, a villager in a developing country will take more pride in the bread he has earned than that, which was given to him with no effort on his part.  Although direct humanitarian aid is important, the hand that lifts him out of the cycle of poverty not only fills the belly, but builds pride in oneself by making them a self sufficient provider for their family.

The second area of influence involves programs to provide and encourage formal education.  By encouraging unskilled employees to seek formal and vocational education in a company related field, businesses can build a cadre of well trained employees, who know and understand the local culture and can therefore more effectively lead their coworkers.  Meanwhile, the employee increases his earning power and ability to influence his society by bettering themselves and improving the prospects for their posterity.

The final task, while long term in nature, is arguably the most important.  A company that exploits the workers and resources without contributing to the wellbeing of the community is often resented and does earn the loyalty of its employees or the host populace.  By investing in the local school system, a company improves the lives of the students, while also building a more capable generation of prospective employees.  Additionally, a father that sees his employer making his child’s life better will often be more devoted than one who only sees the monthly paycheck.  The UNESCO’s 2002 report on its “Education for All” initiative states, “…education is important for at least three reasons.  First, the skills provided by basic education, such as being able to read and write, are valuable in their own right...Second, education can help to displace other more negative features of life…Third, education has a powerful role in empowering those who suffer from multiple disadvantages. Thus women who have benefited from education may simply survive better and longer than they would otherwise.”[2]

While humanitarian aid in the classic sense of providing for the immediate needs of the less fortunate is vital, the underlying goal of any aid program should be to remove the underlying causes of suffering.  Responsible businesses can effectively fill this role.  A great example is Western Union’s Our World, Our Family program.  In addition to providing direct humanitarian aid, Western Union also funds education and mentoring programs to help build self sufficiency in migrant communities.  Western Union has provided educational benefits to over 500,000 migrant youth in the United States over the past 26 years resulting in a 94 percent graduation rate.[3] Western Union’s program and similar initiatives of numerous other corporations are making differences in the lives of those otherwise condemned to poverty.[4]  By giving the gift of education these corporate philanthropists are providing the proverbial fishing hole that will likely feed the man and his loved ones for generations to come.[5]





[1] UNESCO.  The Right to Education (pamphlet).  September 26, 2005.  Paris, France.  <www.unesco.org/education>.  Accessed March 12, 2008.
[2] UNESCO.  Education for All:  Is the World on Track?  2002 EFA Global Monitoring Report.  Paris, France.  <www.unesco.org/education> .  Accessed March 12, 2008.
[3] Western Union.  “Our World, Our Family Program.”  Copyright 2001-2008.  <http://corporate.westernunion.com/ourworld.html> .  Accessed March 12, 2008.
[4] Also see the Indian company NTPC’s corporate responsibility website at https://www.ntpc.co.in/en/corporate-citizenship/empowering-people for another example of how corporations can build sustainable development by investing in the local population.
[5] Other Sources used in this article include: 
-          Bernstein, Jason.  “Is Education the Cure for Poverty?”  The American Prospect.  April 22, 2007. < http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=is education the cure for poverty >.  Accessed March 12,2008.
-          Lodge, George C.  “Using Business to Fight Poverty.”  Working Knowledge for Business Leaders.  Harvard Business School.  August 12, 2002.  <http://hbswk.hbs.edu/cgi-bin/print> .  Accessed March 12, 2008.
-          UNESCO.  “Right to Education.”  <http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php>.   Accessed March 12, 2008.
-          University of Maryland.  Poverty Rates By Education (graph).  <http://bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/poveduc.jpg>.  Accessed March 12, 2008.
-          World Bank Group.  “Education and the World Bank, What is the World Bank Doing to Support Education.”  2008.  <http:web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTEDUCATION>. Accessed March 12, 2008.
-          World Bank Group.  “FAQ.”  Updated April 2006.  <http:web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTEDUCATION>.  Accessed March 12, 2008.
-          World Bank Group.  “Education and Development, Why is Education Important to Development?.”  Copyright 2008.  <http:web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTEDUCATION>.  Accessed March 12, 2008.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

My Leadership Crucible: Caring Enough to Correct





In the barren deserts south of the Dead Sea is a wasteland covered with ancient piles of slag.  Khirbat Hamra Ifdan was one of the industrial centers that fueled the early Bronze Age.  Copper ore was extracted from nearby mines and brought to this site where ancient metallurgists crushed the ore-laden rock, sorted out the ore-rich pieces, and placed them in a cup-shaped clay crucible.  The crucible was then superheated until the copper separated from the rock and other impurities.  The small amount of pure copper was collected, mixed with tin, and formed into bronze tools, ingots, and jewelry; while left-over material or slag was discarded.  This purification process was painstaking and labor intensive, but the end product turned the Kingdom of Moab and later, Israel, into regional powerhouses. 

Due to its ability to turn the ore-laced rock into something valuable by removing impurities, the crucible and the fiery smelting process became symbolic of personal purification in religious and philosophical circles.  Hence, a crucible in a person’s life denotes a time of extraordinary suffering that results in personal a purification that would have been otherwise impossible without that “trial by fire.” 

Most successful leaders have passed through formative crucibles – seeming purgatories, where we suffer, our weaknesses are purged, and, if not broken by the trial, we emerge on the other side better, wiser, and more effective leaders.   I have endured several such transformative periods.  The first occurred over fifteen years ago.

Through a lot of luck and a bit of persistence, I had made it into an interpreters’ program that I had pursued for two years.  I had made it through two thirds of the nine month course, when I was called in to meet with the human resource manager who would determine where I would go after the program.  Rather than telling me that I would be going on to an exciting new assignment, he explained that the teachers didn’t think I had what it takes to be an effective interpreter and recommended I be dropped from the program.  It was perhaps one of the darkest days of my career. 

Because I knew I was not the most capable student in the program and was acutely aware of my shortcomings, I frequently asked my instructors for feedback and suggestions on what I could do to improve.  Each time I was told, “Don’t worry, you’re doing all right.”  These false reassurances made the news all the more devastating.  It wasn’t the truth that I was inadequate that hurt but the possibly well meaning, but nonetheless misleading reassurances, followed by the unexpected revelation of my real standing in the course.  Honest feedback was what I needed most to succeed or at least prepare myself for the inevitable.  That is what I didn’t get.  It hurt that no one had cared enough to counsel and correct me until I was almost beyond help. 

Fortunately, I was able to convince the manager that he should give me a chance to prove myself.  I asked for an evaluation on an interpreting excursion the next day.  To my relief, based on my performance, the manager told me I would finish the program and be assigned to the agency’s overseas office. 

Although I had made it through this trial, my crucible was still not complete.  It continued, but this time with a leader who cared enough to correct.  Within a month, I found myself in Germany interpreting for arms control inspections throughout Europe.  I was assigned to a team lead by a man I still consider one of the most influential people in my life.  He made it clear he demanded the best from his people and would not settle for less.  Despite my experience at the interpreters’ school, I was still young, immature, overconfident, and under-qualified.  Consequently, I made some critical mistakes. 

In contrast to my earlier experience, each and every time I failed to rise to his high, but fair standards, he immediately and plainly pointed out my shortcomings, informed me of the consequences for continued substandard performance, and then provided me ample training opportunities to remedy my shortcomings.  By the time he left our team a year and a half later, I had been able to rise to the standards he demanded.  His praise for my abilities meant much more to me than the empty praise of those who were afraid to point my deficiencies for fear of hurting my feelings.  The foundation he helped me build was the basis of my current success.

As often happens as we progress from follower to leader, I had to learn this lesson from the opposite perspective.  I was placed in charge of a team of extremely talented specialists, one of which, while a phenomenal analyst, struggled in some key areas.  However, despite my desires to never subject someone to what I had gone through, I too hesitated to confront those behaviors that were bringing down the team’s effectiveness in fear of hurting his feelings.  This led to not only personally suffering the consequences of my inaction, but also to my analyst and my entire team failing to reach their full potential.  As his leader, I should have cared enough to set standards, insist they be met, identify where those standards were not met, and impose consequences and remedies for failure.
Since that time, I have learned the value of clearly setting out expectations, tactfully identifying deficiencies, and mentoring those willing to change and capable of rising to the necessary standards.  Those who repeatedly prove themselves unwilling or unable to adapt must be let go or moved to where they can succeed. 

As many leaders, I enjoy praising and awarding excellence in my subordinates but dislike confronting them and meting out discipline when they repeatedly fail to meet stated standards.   From the above crucibles, I have learned the value of clear and achievable standards, paired with fair and predictable consequences for failing to meet them.  I have learned that I must force myself to move outside my comfort zone by identifying and correcting deficiencies clearly and immediately but then afterward, showing an increased concern for their progress by providing the training and guidance they need. 

While a good leader never relishes confronting their team members, they nevertheless do not shrink from identifying and rectifying substandard situations by clear feedback, equitable discipline and caring remediation.  A leader who ignores or tolerates substandard performance and fails to correct shortcomings while issues are still manageable is more destructive to team effectiveness than the despotic manager who, it seems, relishes the opportunity to criticize and belittle.  While the latter frustrates and irritates, the former sabotages progress and development by refusing to take upon themselves the most vital leadership roles of guide, teacher, and mentor.

In his science fiction classic Starship Troopers, Robert Heinlein illustrates the importance of confronting signs of non-compliance early.  He points out that the leader that truly cares about his people doesn’t tolerate noncompliance and incompetence.  The true leader points out shortcomings unambiguously and corrects not out of malice, but with the aim of teaching correct principles.  Failing that, he removes those who repeatedly show themselves unable or unwilling to perform to required standards.  Nevertheless, even firing a subordinate is done out of concern for them and the rest of the team.  The incompetent or unrepentant can thus succeed elsewhere or at least no longer jeopardize the team’s success. 

In my life, the most memorable and effective leaders were not those that coddled me or ignored my shortcomings, but those that first of all, set and enforced a standard and then either rewarded success lavishly or imposed fair and consistent consequences for failing to meet those standards followed by giving me the tools I needed to not fail again.

While confronting non-conformance is difficult for an engaged and caring leader, we must not lose sight of the value of frank, fair, and consistent feedback.  While rewarding success builds our people up and reinforces good behavior, this one vectored approach must be balanced with caring but consistent feedback and discipline.  Neglecting this key function, we sow the seeds of failure, complacence and incompetence in us, our teams, and our people. 

Similar to a furnace and crucible, a leader’s main goal should be to take the potential-laden team member and help them purge the limitations holding them back.  This does not have to be unpleasant to those we mentor, but all too often, change requires we endure some discomfort if we are to come reach our true potential.  The principle of “caring enough to correct” calls for us to help those we lead get through this discomfort and to reach the success on the other side.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Shadows of War: Life and the Reality of War in Ukraine





Photo by Forbes.com



(Revised 5 February 2015)

The question in itself was not all that extraordinary, as a father of a large family; friends have frequently approached for advice on parenting.  We had spoken several times on questions of family values and child rearing.

“When do you think we should start having kids?” my young Ukrainian friend asked me. 

I gave the usual answers.  However, his follow-up question left me speechless.

“What about war?” he continued.

I was dumbfounded.  My wife and I had never had to even contemplate that question.  However, for my friend, this was a crucial consideration.  His country was at war.  Crimea had been taken away by “little green men,” the eastern regions of Ukraine were embroiled in armed conflict, and everyone knew someone fighting in the ATO (Anti-Terrorism Operation).  Not only did my friend have to worry about the possibility that war could spread to Kyiv itself, but that he too may need to defend and possibly die for his country.

I told him that honestly, I had no adequate answer.  My country, while at war for over fourteen years in foreign lands, had not seen armed conflict on its soil for over a century.  This was a question I never had to face.  I explained, however, that it is difficult for me to hear about suffering children in war zones.  I immediately see my own children and shudder to think what the child and the parents are going through.

My friend’s question drove home the reality of Ukraine’s crisis more powerfully than any journalistic report ever could.  My friend had been on the barricades of Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square).  His wife, while supporting his actions, feared for his life and on several occasions begged him not to go.  My friend was one of the tens of thousands of the faces we saw on our television screens dressed in makeshift armor facing down Viktor Yanokovich’s elite riot police.  For him the struggle for a truly independent and free Ukraine was not finished.

This dialog with my friend could just as likely have been repeated on the other side of the battle lines, which stretch through the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Eastern Ukraine.  Young couples in Donbas are certainly pondering the same questions as the sound of Grad rockets and artillery reverberate through their cities and Russian troops stream across the border bringing the latest Russian military hardware with them on their “vacation” to Eastern Ukraine and Ukrainian volunteers gather to meet them.

Additionally, the threat to Ukraine’s stability comes not only from Ukraine’s powerful neighbor, or even from those Russia backs in Ukraine’s eastern regions.  It also comes from those who have volunteered to fight for Ukraine’s territorial integrity.  They have made it clear that they had come out to rid Ukraine of not only foreign interference, but even more so, from the dishonesty, corruption, incompetence, and repression of the political and economic “establishment.”  They have made it clear that those they elected to replace their ousted President and his supporters have a limited time to show progress in reforming Ukraine’s corruption ridden political and economic system before they return to set things right by force.  Thousands of battle-hardened and heavily armed fighters could return to Kyiv to bring about the change the politicians have been unable or unwilling to produce.

What was the catalyst of the rebellion and subsequent conflict?  The Western media has portrayed it primarily as a response to Yanukovich’s rejection of the Association Agreement with the European Union.  In fact, the protests against this action were initially relatively small.  It wasn’t until the Berkut riot police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs tried to forcibly clear out the protesters, that Kyiv at first, and within days much of Ukraine, rose up against the president they had elected just four years before.  This misunderstanding in the West is illustrated by the different names the West and Ukraine give the revolution.  The Western press calls the events of November 2013 through early 2014 the Euromaidan Revolution, while Ukrainians call it the Revolutsiya Natsionalyogo Dostoinstva or the Revolution of National Dignity. 

An tale of two squares serves to illustrate the difference in these two terms.  In downtown Kyiv there are two squares located not far from each other – European Square (Euromaidan) and Independence Square (Maidan Nezalezhnosti).  The pro-EU opposition parties gathered largely on Euromaidan, while by far the largest protests took place on Maidan Nezalezhnosti.  The Independence Square protesters’ demands were much more varied.  While closer ties with the West were important, grievances against government excesses and corruption were by far more prevalent.  This, more than anything else, illustrates how the Ukrainians themselves see their revolution.  It was a demand for independence, for a restoration of national dignity.

Furthermore, it is illustrative that few of those I spoke to in Ukraine said not signing the Association Agreement motivated them to protest.  While they were disappointed in Yanukovich’s move, they were not ready to revolt to change the President’s mind.  In reality, the spark that ignited the mass action was the television footage of bloodied students being beaten by riot gear-clad Internal Affairs troops, purportedly in order to clear space for a New Year’s tree.  This action brought the growing frustration with government corruption and ineffectiveness, combined with Yanukovich’s increasingly repressive and heavy-handed policies to a boiling point.  Tens of thousands rushed to Maidan Nezalezhnosti, overloading the city’s transportation system.

The frustration with Yanukovich’s policies built on years of disappointment as the people, time and time again, elected “champions of freedom and progress,” only to see them subsequently filling their pockets with the ill-gotten fruits of a corrupt economic and political system.  The heroes of the Orange Revolution Viktor Yushchenko and Yulia Timoshenko were not exceptions.  This explains the cool reception Timoshenko received when she appeared on Maidan after her release from prison in February of 2014.  It also explains her limited role today.  She was pro-West, but still part of the establishment.

Yanukovich came to power in 2010 when, frustrated with their fallen Orange Revolution heroes, Ukrainians turned to the man they had rejected in 2004. Unfortunately, the kleptocracy not only continued, but grew and thrived under his rule.  To make matters worse, he filled government posts with people of divided loyalties and began building Putin-like verticals of power and controls over the mass media. 

On the economic front, not only did life for the average Ukrainian not improve, but Ukrainian businesses were sold off to Russian conglomerates and disparities in wealth increased.  Yanukovich’s elaborate “cottage” was a stark reminder of the gulf that separated the average Ukrainian from the power brokers and oligarchs, who ostentatiously flaunt their wealth on the streets of Kyiv with their Bentleys, BMWs, and Ferraris.

These were the reasons my Ukrainian acquaintances gave for rising up against their elected leader and his privileged inner circle.  They were tired of their livelihoods being eroded while Yanukovich and his cronies grew ever richer and cozied up to Putin’s elite at the expense of Ukrainian sovereignty.

The vast majority of protesters were tired of the establishment taking care of its own narrow short-term interests at the expense of the average Ukrainian.  They were tired of being a pawn in the East-West struggle.  They wanted to build a Ukraine that can be prosperous and free of external meddling. 

Is there hope that my friend and his children will see a peaceful and prosperous Ukraine?  I think there is, but that future lies in the hands of the Ukrainians themselves and the path will not be easy. 
After being away for almost five years, the difference in national pride and desire to make a change for the better was palpable.  Kyiv of 2009 was emotionally drained and resigned.  Kyiv of 2015 is energized, proud of what they accomplished and determined that the blood spilt would not have been in vain.

Only by demanding real change can they build a strong and prosperous Ukraine that can stand up for its own interests in the face of outside forces, both from the East and the West.  Right now, Ukraine’s plundered economy can barely support its brave, but battered military, and its outdated factories cannot compete with its modern, high-tech western or even less efficient Russian competitors.  Ukraine needs investment, innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership.
Consequently, much needs to be done to create an investment and innovation-friendly environment.  Property and labor laws are outdated, many dating back to Ukraine’s Soviet past.  Foreigners cannot buy land, and small business ownership is complicated by corruption and onerous registration rules that not only make it difficult to do business, but also make it almost impossible to close that business and let employees go when things don’t work out. 

An equitable and efficient system of business registration and liquidation are critical to small business.  Whereas many small businesses fail, a reasonable means of exit is vital.  A friend and economic consultant at CASE Ukraine[1]  explained that it may take years to officially close a business.  This results in obligations to pay the numerous licensing and operating fees long after the business has ceased to function. 

Additionally, the Soviet era employee regulations give employees rights to compensation for months, even in cases when they simply stop coming to work.  This, combined with the above issue makes the cost of registering and running a legitimate business higher than operating in the off the radar.
As a result, much of the Ukrainian economy exists in the shadows and its workers are paid “in envelopes,” which leaves businessmen vulnerable to shakedowns by corrupt officials.  This also means that the uncollected taxes the government needs to build effective infrastructure, defense capability, and social supports go instead into the pockets of extortionists. 

While Western governments have pledged financial support to Ukraine, the amounts promised are woefully inadequate.  Ukraine cannot be saved by international aid alone.  The money needed to rebuild her aged and plundered infrastructure outstrips what donors and creditors have promised.  Only foreign and domestic investment can provide the amounts Ukraine needs to create the economy her citizens dream of.  However, those investments will only begin to flow when Ukraine has taken the steps necessary to ensure a safe, secure, and adequate return on investment and to establish an equitable business climate.

I contended in my article “Money to the Winds – Russia’s Capital Dilemma,” [2] with greater risk, capital will expect higher returns.  Absent adequate incentives, capital will avoid risk.  Right now, the Ukrainian system promises plenty of risk with little prospect for adequate returns. 

By meeting the demands of the protesters on Maidan Nezalezhnosti to liquidate corruption and create conditions for legitimate business to prosper, Ukraine can change this situation.  However, the clock is ticking and Ukrainians will not wait forever for the changes they demand.  They have given their current leaders a mandate, but one with conditions and a timeline. 

President Petro Poroshenko inherited a job few would envy – a country wracked by civil war and near financial collapse.  If he is able to do what he was elected to accomplish – eliminating corruption and graft, maintaining territorial integrity, and restructuring the government and economic system – he will go down in history as one of the greatest leaders of our time.  If he cannot, he will take his place on the list of Ukrainian presidents defeated by processes beyond his ability to control.

I have hope for the former and fear the latter.  I hope my friends will be able to build the Ukraine they so ardently desire, one where they can raise their children – a Ukraine where those children will look upon them as that great generation that stood up to corruption and tyranny and built a better nation worthy to take its place among freedom loving democracies.